L.S.D Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 Care face.K'dash, you seem to have had sand in your pants since you came back, is something bothering you?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>You haven't known me for the most of my life. I'm that damn bitter most of the time.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hell, I'm mostly sarcastic and bitter towards llife. Shaun of the Dead? Please enlighten me.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> A spoof of Dqwn of The Dead. It goes to show why Brits are obsessed with their bars and beers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexis Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 random guy You don't mean armour of god do you? The Jackie Chan flick? I thnk there WAS a sequel to that. Well maybe he is talking about that Brazilian movie Cidade de Deus Which means City of God, but i don´t think you, that movie is just too god for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja X Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 (edited) yep thats the one.its the true story of a photographer and the life of gangsters at rio de janeiro. Edited December 15, 2004 by Ninja X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted December 15, 2004 Author Share Posted December 15, 2004 City of God was an awesome movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skythe Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 I regret to inform some people that 28 Days Later...IS NOT A ZOMBIE FLICK! Dammit! Phuck DotD remake. The remake of Night of the Living Dead owns so hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyokugenKiss Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 Night of the living dead '90 was good, the script was written by George A. Romero and he finally got to do it the way he wanted to, although i would have wanted it to be a bit more gory since it was Directed by Tom Savini and i disagree with you, 28 days later is a zombie flick, its just that there infected and not the living-dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 28 Days Later is not a zombie movie. Let's take some points; Not undead.Infected people (Note: still alive), but still living.Just very, very angry people who'd like to rip you apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja X Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 how about the king of sequels,the best sequel ever made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyokugenKiss Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 WAYNES WORLD 2!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted December 15, 2004 Author Share Posted December 15, 2004 WAYNES WORLD 2!!!<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ah yes, that was actually funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skythe Posted December 16, 2004 Share Posted December 16, 2004 28 Days Later is not a zombie movie. Let's take some points; Not undead.Infected people (Note: still alive), but still living.Just very, very angry people who'd like to rip you apart.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Indeed. None of the infected died so therefore there were no reanimated bodies roaming the streets of England. Thus voiding it of being a zombie flick. They're basically Enraged/Beserked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now