Inky Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 <-- Rabid Win2k user <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Same here <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I tried win2k but it seems like the sega saturn of OS's lol. ms turned it's back on 2k before it really got anywhere.
solidius23 Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 it doesnt matter to me i got 2 or 3 legit copies of xp but i would never be stupid enough to get any updates from MS ,
NeoMaster Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 I wouldn't know why it would be stupid. Some updates protect your computer from critical flaws. There was this bug I read in the news that does something with media player and ms released a fix for it the next day. Being the paranoid type, i appreciate stuff like that, but maybe that's just me.
Wizard Posted January 27, 2005 Author Posted January 27, 2005 2k is pretty good for networking, but it does have it's flaws when your gaming.
Bluestinger X Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 whats weird was i was trying to add a hd to my pc the other day and when i started up windows it said my windows had changes so much that i needed to reactivate it... ive never heard this happen to anyone else. Well i reactivated it and even though i had a good pin number i still feel weird and paranoid lol.
iq_132 Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 2k is pretty good for networking, but it does have it's flaws when your gaming.I've never had any flaws in gaming.. I do like the fact that 2k doesn't come with all of that bloaty crap and worthless eyecandy XP does.
Wizard Posted January 27, 2005 Author Posted January 27, 2005 XP is actually much better designed for gaming for it's younger 2k variant.
taratata Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 XP is actually much better designed for gaming for it's younger 2k variant.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I read that too. But I never had any problems with gaming on win2k, so I wonder if it's not just an attempt by M$ to hype XP.
Wizard Posted January 27, 2005 Author Posted January 27, 2005 Based on boot times and performence, UT2k4 does better on XP then 2K. check it out sometimes.
iq_132 Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 Based on boot times and performence, UT2k4 does better on XP then 2K. check it out sometimes.Oh nos! UT2k4 takes 1ms more to boot! Win2k is teh crap. LOL
L.S.D Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 I'm using pirated copy. If i want updates, I just go get them from my local pirates It still save me tons of money. And Yeah, I am heartless, cheap SOB So what? I won't use 10% of my salary just to get a legitimate Windowswhen I can do that with 0.5%.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now