Gryph Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Seems like that may be the name of the next XBOX...http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000760030410/ And boy is it a stupid name.
BoomBa_GoosE Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 is there a significance to that number? did i miss something? i always thought x-box next sounded pretty neat. xbox 360...mouthful...
Gryph Posted February 5, 2005 Author Posted February 5, 2005 I have no idea what the significance is. 3D objects can be rotated 360 degrees...but it's not the first 3D capable system.
NeuronMaster Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 I guess it beats the standard 2..times 180
BlackKnight Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 This is just stupid... they probly just want to make it sound more high tech than Playstation 3... this is 360. Stupid idea.
Agozer Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Wow, that's stupid. I kinda would have understood if the names was 180, but 360 just brings it back to where it was.
Gryph Posted February 5, 2005 Author Posted February 5, 2005 They should just do what Winamp did. "XBOX 3...so good we skipped a number."
NeoMaster Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Looks like Microsoft skipped 359 numbers because it was so good?
Agozer Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Looks like Microsoft skipped 359 numbers because it was so good? Microsoft has always had flawed reasoning for some features of their products.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now