Bluestinger X Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 I also think this thread is pointless. It brings back memories of when people where deciding whether to buy ff8 or dreamcast...lol.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>FF8 was such a waste of money.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>true dat...
Agozer Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 I also think this thread is pointless. It brings back memories of when people where deciding whether to buy ff8 or dreamcast...lol.FF8 was such a waste of money.No it wasn't. It has a special place in my gaming collection, being the first PSX game I ever bought. Besides, the gameplay was fun, and the story was enjoyable (although limping at some spots).
Wizard Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 I still can't get over that it's just wacky coincidences imo.At least the 3 of the god knows what character art rocks. You know what they are. Rather, they, are.
Agozer Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 I still can't get over that it's just wacky coincidences imo.Yeah, I agree on that... That was some crazy crap.
mad37man Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 If it takes microsoft too long for halo3 i will ban them without resent.
Gryph Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 If it takes microsoft too long for halo3 i will ban them without resent.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why? Isn't it a good thing when developers have as much time as possible to make their game to put as many things in. If Microsoft rushes Bungie and puts a strict release date, they'll have to cut stuff.
Agozer Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 If it takes microsoft too long for halo3 i will ban them without resent.Sounds like a serious case of Halo fanboy-ism right there. What Mr. G said is true.
Wizard Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 Unlike other people. I want the actual Halo game. One thats has the freedom Bungie really deserves. Talk about dev hell for those guys trying create Halo.
Daeval Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 If it takes microsoft too long for halo3 i will ban them without resent.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why? Isn't it a good thing when developers have as much time as possible to make their game to put as many things in. If Microsoft rushes Bungie and puts a strict release date, they'll have to cut stuff.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Amen. They flocked up Halo 1 enough already, so that you didn't even see most of its advertised features until Halo 2. I'm interested to see what happens with the pc/console 3-step hybrid thing MS is trying to do with XBNext. It looks like a bunch of monopoly-inducing hooey, but it could be interesting. Every generation the "console wars" reaches a fever pitch around launch dates, with every fanboy predicting the death and destruction of heretical systems. Personally, if all three systems have awesome games and succeed financially, I will be a happy man. The important thing is that no single console manufacturer completely push out the others, especially now that MicroSoft is in the mix.
Lucandrake Posted March 7, 2005 Author Posted March 7, 2005 Well, daeveal has a extremly good point.. Why want one system to win overrall when you can keep the variety of games we have now. I prefer being able to choose and having more good adventures to play with then having one extreme overall system. I love FPS, but even every now and then I get tired of it.
Wizard Posted March 7, 2005 Posted March 7, 2005 (edited) I really recommend this to anyone who wants to know how Halo was, is and what it looks like today. They cut out a mother load of stuff just to make the Xbox release. Not to mention they thru down the pension "Finish your game now, or never release it." Evolution of Halo - google it. Edited March 7, 2005 by K`dash
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now