Wizard Posted March 22, 2005 Author Posted March 22, 2005 A simple solution to most of u guys, get a bloody ps2!!!!<{POST_SNAPBACK}> cause sony is da devil... and sc3 would look better on another system anyways.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>It would look better on other systems. Like, you would actually tell the difference.
Agozer Posted March 22, 2005 Posted March 22, 2005 A simple solution to most of u guys, get a bloody ps2!!!! cause sony is da devil... and sc3 would look better on another system anyways.Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.It would look better on other systems. Like, you would actually tell the difference.Sure, it would look better on other systems, but it still looks kickass on the PS2, old hardware notwithstanding.
Sybarite Paladin AxL Posted March 22, 2005 Posted March 22, 2005 I'm not the one to talk here since SC isn't my specialty but I saw SC2 once I thought it was pretty cool except for the fact that different boards had different special chars....
solidius23 Posted March 22, 2005 Posted March 22, 2005 If they can do with SC3 what they did with Tekken 5 on the PS2, then i wont have any complants in the graphics dept. Besides if the gameplay is good i can definatly look over minor graphics upgrades i would get with the x-puke or the gamesuck.(since i own all 3 systems i can bash them)
supa_al Posted March 22, 2005 Posted March 22, 2005 Hahahahahaahaha.... A DISAPPOINTMENT? That is soooo hillarious. Perhaps it was a dissapointment for PS2 owners, because of the crappy exclusive character. But to say that the game was a disappointment is just plain dumb. Who ever wrote that is an idiot. The game was awsome. Period. Only having a special character for each system made it a bit better, nothing more, nothing less.
Bluestinger X Posted March 22, 2005 Posted March 22, 2005 i liked the spawn and link... but ps2 version bleh.
Wizard Posted March 22, 2005 Author Posted March 22, 2005 Hahahahahaahaha.... A DISAPPOINTMENT? That is soooo hillarious. Perhaps it was a dissapointment for PS2 owners, because of the crappy exclusive character. But to say that the game was a disappointment is just plain dumb. Who ever wrote that is an idiot. The game was awsome. Period. Only having a special character for each system made it a bit better, nothing more, nothing less.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>So I'm plain dumb. Awesome insight dude. SCII is broken and it isn't awesome. It's just very pretty and interesting. Nothing big up there.
supa_al Posted March 22, 2005 Posted March 22, 2005 (edited) So I'm plain dumb. Awesome insight dude. SCII is broken and it isn't awesome. It's just very pretty and interesting. Nothing big up there. What i meant was in regards to the article. Edited March 22, 2005 by supa_al
Wizard Posted March 22, 2005 Author Posted March 22, 2005 (edited) I just noticed, why would Namco give this info too Gamepro insted of, you know, Famitsu. Edited March 23, 2005 by K`dash
Dooz Posted March 23, 2005 Posted March 23, 2005 I never saw the draw to Soul Calibur 2. It was so... Dull.
Weirdy Posted March 23, 2005 Posted March 23, 2005 I just noticed, why would Namco give this info too Gamepro insted of, you know, Famitsu.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>cause Lamepro are a bunch of whores and they most likely got their faces a little white for this info
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now