Smilee Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 Quake mutliplayer IMO is a tad bit faster than UT mutliplayer. Also a lot more hectic in some maps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 Quake mutliplayer IMO is a tad bit faster than UT mutliplayer. Also a lot more hectic in some maps.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Actually it is. Compared to UT, the stockmaps hold enough to encourage 1 v 1 in a large enviorment with the tightest quaters. IMO Quake III 1v1 is still much funner then UT2k3/4's. Mostly because I can own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucandrake Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 I was just playing IG on UTGOTY, man, the server choose a map that looked like a rip from Quake 3, I felt a harder time getting the flag there then back when I used to play quake as I remember Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 Since I hardly play online multiplayer games, I've stuck with single player ones. But if I had to choose, UT shells out more enjoyment online. I've always liked the AI of the bots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucandrake Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 lol until 2k4 came along all the AI (exept XAN) sucked ASS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 lol until 2k4 came along all the AI (exept XAN) sucked ASS!Just play the original UT on Godlike difficulty and it's far from sucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 lol until 2k4 came along all the AI (exept XAN) sucked ASS!<{POST_SNAPBACK}>No, AI was good for Quake III and UT. It's just been improved since then. It in no way shape or form sucked ASS. But I have faith in Raven to make the game awesome. From CyClones to Jedi Academy, almost everything they've done is great. I found some sketch art and extremely high poly models for Quake IV on my computer (I've had them for a while) and they look awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucandrake Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 yeah, next generation always looked awsome, even back then when nintendo was gonna be released. O, and agozer, I do play GL in UT, only settings with the bots I ever play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 lol until 2k4 came along all the AI (exept XAN) sucked ASS!<{POST_SNAPBACK}>No, AI was good for Quake III and UT. It's just been improved since then. It in no way shape or form sucked ASS. But I have faith in Raven to make the game awesome. From CyClones to Jedi Academy, almost everything they've done is great. I found some sketch art and extremely high poly models for Quake IV on my computer (I've had them for a while) and they look awesome.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Raven's track record is still good. When ever I think of Raven, I think of that quote that was said at QuakeCon. "Are the women hot in Dallas?" That has no relvence to this thread, but it just reminds me of that panel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skythe Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 I guess that explains why Asia Carrerra was a hardcore UT player<{POST_SNAPBACK}> She's a porn star. Her opinions are void. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now