Gryph Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 What is Halo? <{POST_SNAPBACK}>It's a substitute for the word crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.S.D Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 What is Halo? <{POST_SNAPBACK}>It's a substitute for the word crap.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Which is so true. And since American like it so much until they skip school, American are crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weirdy Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 (edited) funny you mention skipping school to play a fps game fps games are pretty addictive to those who let it get to them my brother might even flunk the 10th grade due to his addiction to Rainbow Six 3 while I'm almost a hs graduate ey, maybe I'll have a college degree by the time he finishes hs Edited May 16, 2005 by Weirdy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluestinger X Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 I dont even see how this is a big deal. Ofcourse MS would do something like this.. if they didnt they would be retarded. No it wont hurt sony much but im sure halo3 will sell very well and make sonys launch titles look lame. lol whats sony gona do.. make a sequal to kill zone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 If Sony still has an agreement with Rockstar they could roll out with GTA 4 which would kill Halo 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluestinger X Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 (edited) and it would end up on 360 sooner or later anyways. Everyone knows that... rockstar isnt dumb enough to just release it on one system. Sony dosnt pay them enough for that. gta games uber suck anyways. Edited May 16, 2005 by Bluestinger X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 Hahaha... Yeah, Halo 3 will surely hinder the PS3's sales. I think I'll vote yes just for the hell of it. Or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dooz Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 Everyone knows that... rockstar isnt dumb enough to just release it on one system. Sony dosnt pay them enough for that. <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Actually, the reason the GTA games were released so late on the X-Box was because Rockstar signed a deal with Sony that GTA would be only released on PS2 for an entire year. So yeah, they aren't dumb enough to only release it on one system, but they are willing to make it so by the time it's released for another system, everyone already has it for the PS2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aoshi Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 I think microsoft should rethink that idea as it may hurt their main franchise, they should adopt a finish when it is done policy to finish a game that wont be buggy or sucky, rather than promisoing a date rushing it out and delivering mediocrity. and like halo 2 which was delayed, delays may break promised dates and turn attention to other consoles................and make hornier halo fans go ariiieee. I played halo its a good multiplayer, but i more of a tactics player. Pc rts's rule them all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Posted May 16, 2005 Share Posted May 16, 2005 They could either make a simple dent in Sony's plans and/or harm their only big hitter in the process. I would be very surprised if it made much of a difference, though it would be funny if a single game ruined a brand new systems launch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 Microsoft's launch of Halo 3 on PS3 launch day has officially been deflected by this: GTA Next to be a PS3 launch title If it really is a launch title, then it'll be quite an interesting show since GTA: San Andreas has sold quite a few more copies than Halo 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts