Gryph Posted June 9, 2005 Posted June 9, 2005 I'd like to be held against my will at The Cheesecake Factory. But interesting analysis, Sultan...now we'll see how correct you are.
OverlordMondo Posted June 9, 2005 Posted June 9, 2005 Culkin once said that he had been molested by Michael, but he now denies the claim, and supports Michael's defense.
Sultan Posted June 9, 2005 Posted June 9, 2005 Culkin once said that he had been molested by Michael, but he now denies the claim, and supports Michael's defense.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Actually I don't think he ever claimed to have been molested, did he? Rather, other people claimed he had been molested by Jackson, and Culkin denied it. I could be wrong though. Too lazy to fact check that.
OverlordMondo Posted June 10, 2005 Posted June 10, 2005 Culkin once said that he had been molested by Michael, but he now denies the claim, and supports Michael's defense.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Actually I don't think he ever claimed to have been molested, did he? Rather, other people claimed he had been molested by Jackson, and Culkin denied it. I could be wrong though. Too lazy to fact check that.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>That may have been it, yeah. I know I Head something along these lines though.
Diso Posted June 10, 2005 Posted June 10, 2005 I haven't really been following the Jackson case much but I voted guilty and below 10 counts but by reading other posts meh.
Sybarite Paladin AxL Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 with the risk of sounding gay, I voted innocent on all charges but I haven't been following the case at all, butI think he's a good man, weird but good...
Ryuken Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 i think he's gone crazy after he turned white and lost his nose, that's y i think he's guilty
suvo Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 dude he has monkeys as pets.... the common pet is a dog / catthat show sumink
Sultan Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 Just heard on good monring america (I watch that and Extra, so I guess I'm pretty much an expert on this damn case) that he CAN be convicted of a misdemeanor count of giving alcohol to a minor instead of a felony. The difference is whether or not they think it was proven that he did it in order to molest the child. If they can't prove it was for that reason, its a misdemeanor (more likely a fine than jail time). Taking this jury an awful long time, isn't it? That's not a good sign for Jackson I don't think.
BoomBa_GoosE Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 dude, i bet if any of us were filthy rich, we'd have some weird ass animals as pets too. id be like scarface and get a tiger =D
Recommended Posts