Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm pretty sure they don't have to figure out what to do. They aren't idiots, they made the game so they know how to remove content. And where did you get this $160 million for fines? That's absolutely ridiculous.

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

So... Why is Rockstar getting penalized for this? It's the ESRB's fault for not finding it. And besides, who flocking cares, it's just a little sexual inuuendo.

Edited by Dooz
Posted

No, it's not actually the ESRB's fault for not finding it. It's Rockstar's for not telling them about it.

Posted

No, the publisher has to tell the ESRB what exactly is in the game. From the ESRB site:

How are the games rated?

 

To get a game certified with an ESRB rating, publishers fill out a detailed questionnaire explaining exactly what's in the game, and submit it to ESRB along with actual videotaped footage of the game, showing the most extreme content and an accurate representation of the context and product as a whole. Working independently, three trained raters then view the game footage and recommend the rating and content descriptors they believe are most appropriate. ESRB then compares the raters' recommendations to make sure that there's consensus. Usually, the raters agree and their recommendation becomes final. However, when the raters recommend different ratings, additional raters may be requested to review the game in order to reach broader consensus. Once consensus on a rating and content descriptors is reached, ESRB issues an official rating certificate to the game's publisher.

 

And read this from a game developer: http://playfulpassion.blogspot.com/

 

The ESRB is responsible for assigning accurate ratings for every video game that is published, based on what they consider acceptable standards for content across multiple demographics. Therefore, publishers and developers must communicate and make available to the ratings board every byte of content in their games. Smart publishers know that they need to be upfront with the ESRB about possibly objectionable content, rather than leave their testers to stumble upon it. For example, the portrayal of blood, gore, and physical violence is a very important factor in determining whether or not a game should get a "T" or an "M" rating. The standards are detailed, and very sensitive, and have to take into account myriad factors regarding the portrayal in order to arrive at an acceptable rating.
When publishers submit a game for ESRB review, they either have to take video footage of every level, environment, and menu of the game and submit that with a build, or give them cheat codes and access to all levels. They must also tell them about easter eggs, hidden content, unlockable content, etc. The ESRB must know, and should know everything.
Posted

Ah. Alright then.

 

I still don't think they should be punished for an optional ratings system.

Posted (edited)

so i guess the Strong Sexual Content, in M rating doesn't cover it and the rarely used AO rating is needed for computer render porn

Edited by Ryuken
Posted

Hmm i wonder didnt the original Mortal Kombat also need a cheat that unlocks something (Fatalities) that would have changed the rating otherwise.... the only difference is one is about violence the other is about sex hmmm

Posted
Hmm wasnt it that one south park episode that said "It seems as long as sex is around parents dont care about violence"

 

 

it was that manga/anime episode

 

where they didn't care that butters got a shuriken in his eye because Eric walked naked across the stage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...