Jump to content

LA church to pay $600,000,000 for *pedophile* clergy abuse


Alpha

Recommended Posts

LOS ANGELES - The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles will settle its clergy abuse cases for at least $600 million, by far the largest payout in the church's sexual abuse scandal, The Associated Press learned Saturday.

 

Attorneys for the archdiocese and the plaintiffs are expected to announce the deal Monday, the day the first of more than 500 clergy abuse cases was scheduled for jury selection, according to two people with knowledge of the agreement. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the settlement had not been made public.

 

The archdiocese and its insurers will pay between $600 million and $650 million to about 500 plaintiffs — an average of $1.2 million to $1.3 million per person. The settlement also calls for the release of confidential priest personnel files after review by a judge assigned to oversee the litigation, the sources said.

 

The settlements would push the total amount paid out by the U.S. church since 1950 to more than $2 billion, with about a quarter of that coming from the Los Angeles archdiocese.

 

It wasn't immediately clear how the payout would be split among the insurers, the archdiocese and several Roman Catholic religious orders. A judge must sign off on the agreement, and final details were being ironed out.

 

Lead plaintiffs' attorney Ray Boucher confirmed the sides were working on a deal but would not discuss specifics. He said that negotiations would continue through the weekend and that there were still many unresolved aspects.

 

Tod Tamberg, archdiocese spokesman, declined to comment on any settlement details.

 

"The archdiocese will be in court Monday morning," he said.

 

[...]

 

"We're 48 hours away from starting the trial, and I've been spending a lot of time getting emotionally prepared to take them on, but I'm glad," he said. "It's been a long five years."

 

The settlement would be the largest ever by a Roman Catholic archdiocese since the clergy sexual abuse scandal erupted in Boston in 2002. The largest payout so far has been by the Diocese of Orange, Calif., in 2004, for $100 million.

 

Facing a flood of abuse claims, five dioceses — Tucson, Ariz.; Spokane, Wash.; Portland, Ore.; Davenport, Iowa, and San Diego — sought bankruptcy protection.

 

The Los Angeles archdiocese, its insurers and various Roman Catholic orders have paid more than $114 million to settle 86 claims so far.

 

The largest of those came in December, when the archdiocese reached a $60 million settlement with 45 people whose claims dated from before the mid-1950s and after 1987 — periods when it had little or no sexual abuse insurance. Several religious orders in California have also reached multimillion-dollar settlements in recent months, including the Carmelites, the Franciscans and the Jesuits.

 

However, more than 500 other lawsuits against the archdiocese had remained unresolved despite years of legal wrangling. Most of the outstanding lawsuits were generated by a 2002 state law that revoked for one year the statute of limitations for reporting sexual abuse.

 

[...]

 

Lead plaintiffs' attorney Ray Boucher confirmed the sides were working on a deal but would not discuss specifics. He said that negotiations would continue through the weekend and that there were still many unresolved aspects.

 

[...]

 

"We're 48 hours away from starting the trial, and I've been spending a lot of time getting emotionally prepared to take them on, but I'm glad," he said. "It's been a long five years."

 

The settlement would be the largest ever by a Roman Catholic archdiocese since the clergy sexual abuse scandal erupted in Boston in 2002. The largest payout so far has been by the Diocese of Orange, Calif., in 2004, for $100 million.

 

[...]

 

However, more than 500 other lawsuits against the archdiocese had remained unresolved despite years of legal wrangling. Most of the outstanding lawsuits were generated by a 2002 state law that revoked for one year the statute of limitations for reporting sexual abuse.

 

Cardinal Roger Mahony recently told parishioners in an open letter that the archdiocese was selling its high-rise administrative building and considering the sale of about 50 other nonessential church properties to raise funds for a settlement.

 

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge overseeing the cases recently ruled that Mahony could be called to testify in the second trial on schedule, and attorneys for plaintiffs wanted to call him in many more.

 

The same judge also cleared the way for four people to seek punitive damages — something that could have opened the church to tens of millions of dollars in payouts if the ruling had been expanded to other cases.

Damn, that's a lot of cash. It just goes to show to what extent these religious groups will go to keep a good image. :)

 

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070714/ap_on_re_us/church_abuse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude, religion makes alot of money off donations it's crazy. They pay no taxes either!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For an organisation that has no established means of income, they sure have a lot of money.

 

 

edit: well, it says they have to sell about 50 properties to get the settlement amount.

Still, it needed money to get those properties in the first place.

Edited by Robert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Religion is like some sort of veiled threat. They come up to you all like, "Give me your money, or after you die you'll suffer for eternity." It's bullying is what it is. No different from common street thugs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Religion is like some sort of veiled threat. They come up to you all like, "Give me your money, or after you die you'll suffer for eternity." It's bullying is what it is. No different from common street thugs.

Except bullets actually hurt :P:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Religions are for the weak cuz almost every reason people use to believe in a religion is a sign of weakness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont ask why the reverend has to have a nice house, dont ask why the reverend has to drive a nice car, dont.....assssk.

You posted that in the wrong forum, few people will know what you're talkin about. But i sure do. LMFAO

 

Me hates church so me no give to craps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...