fumanchu Posted June 9, 2008 Share Posted June 9, 2008 Multi-player and vehicles,also using the cod4 engine.back to world war2 AGAIN! article viavideogaming247. http://videogaming247.com/2008/06/09/cod5-...apart-from-psp/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackKnight Posted June 9, 2008 Share Posted June 9, 2008 Ergh. CoD5 is going to ruin everything CoD4 built up. It's going to be CoD3 all over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted June 9, 2008 Share Posted June 9, 2008 Honestly, I don't know where they would take COD5. Since COD4 is a game "ripped from the headlines" and all. They could of either went WW2 or Future Battlefield. One things for sure, they can tell a story with their games. COD3 still sucked though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlordMondo Posted June 9, 2008 Share Posted June 9, 2008 Call of the Honorable Medal of Duty is getting to be a really old genre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackKnight Posted June 9, 2008 Share Posted June 9, 2008 There are other modern theatres to use though.. make up fictitious modern conflicts. Asia, Pacific, South America, Eastern Europe... why bloody WW2 again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fumanchu Posted June 9, 2008 Author Share Posted June 9, 2008 Thats what i was thinking bk.i wished they would stick to the modern combat scenario,it made for a great game.oh well at least this time there wont be any nazis in sight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted June 11, 2008 Share Posted June 11, 2008 CoD can go more towards the Pacific Theater though. They haven't done that yet. They've pretty much covered Europe, Russia and parts of Africa already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garyoak99 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 Ergh. CoD5 is going to ruin everything CoD4 built up. It's going to be CoD3 all over again. Can anyone tell me what the differences are between CoD 1, 2, and 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackKnight Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 CoD1 was one of the first WW2 shooters. Was good. CoD2 was more of the same but still good. CoD3 was made by different devs, was console only, and was trash. CoD4 saved the series and was made by Infinity Ward once again. CoD5 won't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garyoak99 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 CoD1 was one of the first WW2 shooters. Was good. CoD2 was more of the same but still good. CoD3 was made by different devs, was console only, and was trash. CoD4 saved the series and was made by Infinity Ward once again. CoD5 won't be. Oh, thanks! I had trouble seeing the differences between the first three games because they all had WW2 Europe in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shoma Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 (edited) Hush up rookies....It'll own!THey're even more realistic properties into the game in my own opinion(back to the plot topic).I've seen WW2 told in at least 34 different ways so the minute i get the game, im going straight on XBL(Live will rule becuz they know how much pple play it online) and i wont eve n bother the single unless im bored.THe only way this will suck (to me) is if they screw up their multi player in the very least...If dats the case, i'll sell it Gamestop and go back cod4. Edited June 13, 2008 by Shoma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now