Explosive Misanthropy Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 Ummm.... I'm pretty sure visectomies are reversable. I've heard that there are the permenant visectomies, and reversable ones. It's not like they cut your nuts off or anything. Unless you went to a veterinarian and got neutered by accident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackKnight Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 You're pretty wrong. Success rates are pitiful and even if successful the rate of conception is cut by at least 50%. It also significantly increases the risk of deformity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inky Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 well I spoke to a few Drs and even had an appoinment a few years ago but ended up not doing it. and I will say this. no Dr I talked to would do a vasectomy on someone with out kids already. and you had to see a shrink for evaluation before the procedure could be performed. (these may be state or even federal laws I dunno, bat thats the way it is here) so I highly doubt supersoaka got a vasectomy at such a young age with no lil soakas confirmed to be running around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explosive Misanthropy Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 Ummm, I am a girl, how much am I suppose to know about visectomies? I'm never gonna get one, so I go by what I hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackKnight Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 Really? You seem exactly the type to really revel in all the gory sadistic details. Being a girl notwithstanding and this being all said respectfully, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explosive Misanthropy Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 yup, I love gory detail. It makes me hard. ;pJust kidding, but I don't think a guy should get one cause a chick told em to. I'd never tell anyone to do it.Condoms and birth control sound like a good combination to me as opposed to a visectomy. There's also this plastic thing for chicks that they insert and it stays there for 5 years or something. thats a whole lot better than a visectomy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackKnight Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 Agreed. We can at least be glad for the consistency of it. SuperSoaka's streak of poor judgement and / or bullsh!t remains unbroken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 I feel this is a really stupid thing to do, and even worse if you are young. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solidius23 Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 i hope your doc told u about the chance of the vasectomy making you impotent. and you should not be burning either and u dont wait 4 weeks for sex its usually a 3-5 day wait, anyways u r nuts for letting a doc come near your junk with a sharp instrument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken_cinder Posted July 13, 2008 Share Posted July 13, 2008 well I spoke to a few Drs and even had an appoinment a few years ago but ended up not doing it. and I will say this. no Dr I talked to would do a vasectomy on someone with out kids already. and you had to see a shrink for evaluation before the procedure could be performed. (these may be state or even federal laws I dunno, bat thats the way it is here) so I highly doubt supersoaka got a vasectomy at such a young age with no lil soakas confirmed to be running around. I can tell you right now, if he is from the US, he's using a proxy located on an Australian ISPs network. I went digging to see if he was indeed GC like some suggested, he is not. (Unless he's, again, using a proxy) And BK, there are a few different procedures for a vasectomy. 1 type, I am fully aware of (I looked into it) is totally reversible and has very low rate for failure upon reversal.It also has a risk of the procedure reversing itself.It works on the same principle that my wife was looking at for having her tubes tied, with them inserting something in the "tube" where a growth forms around it......it's good for a temporary test in women to see if having their tubes tied will be a bad thing for them in the long run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatal Rose Posted July 13, 2008 Share Posted July 13, 2008 sorry to read this SupaSoaka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now