Wizard Posted July 19, 2008 Share Posted July 19, 2008 there is no reason for it to look worse on the ps3 since it's being made to work on it first. people need to realize just how powerful the ps3 is.We do know how powerful it is. And on paper, it dominates the 360 in one area, computing. No where else, it can crunch numbers better, not faster (since they both run at the same clock speed of a 3.2GHz) then the 360. Beyond the real difference in rendering platforms, they are very much alike in every way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devia Eleven Posted July 19, 2008 Share Posted July 19, 2008 I'm calling who cares which system's graphics look better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavin19 Posted July 19, 2008 Share Posted July 19, 2008 I'm calling who cares which system's graphics look better? That's the most sense you've made, ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackKnight Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 I'm calling who cares which system's graphics look better?People who shell out the same price should get the same product. And I hate anyone who comes to a gaming board with that 'it's all about the gameplay' attitude. Graphics matter, else how the hell do you justify the price of consoles, let alone that 1Gb GX2 that is always sold out when I turn up at MSY? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlordMondo Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 I'm calling who cares which system's graphics look better?People who shell out the same price should get the same product. And I hate anyone who comes to a gaming board with that 'it's all about the gameplay' attitude. Graphics matter, else how the hell do you justify the price of consoles, let alone that 1Gb GX2 that is always sold out when I turn up at MSY?I can only justify the price of new hardware because software developers use only the latest and best when developing. If developers today used the hardware of yesterday, then I'd gladly not pay the extra hundreds of dollars for today's graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackKnight Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 They still make PS2 games. It still gets its share of the multiplatformers and Persona 4 just came out. Starcraft II likely won't use the latest PC tech either, just as examples. And there are still a million and one Korean MMOs to play that use archaic technology. Point is when you buy a next gen machine you're choosing to buy into the latest tech and latest graphics- you're not forced into it. And you have a right to be demanding about those things for that reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlordMondo Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 That's true, mostly. Except a lot of other people have already bought into it, so now the current hardware is the standard and people aren't going to stop developing for it. I could start a campaign for boycotting future hardware, but I don't think anyone would follow me. Kind of how no one is going to follow that American who thinks he's Japanese. On a side note, I had no idea of Persona 4 or any other new PS2 games, and I have a lot of respect for Blizzard for stepping back a bit on their hardware requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devia Eleven Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 I'm calling who cares which system's graphics look better?People who shell out the same price should get the same product. And I hate anyone who comes to a gaming board with that 'it's all about the gameplay' attitude. Graphics matter, else how the hell do you justify the price of consoles, let alone that 1Gb GX2 that is always sold out when I turn up at MSY? The PS3 and the 360 don't have much differences in multi-platform games when it comes to graphics, even if either one of the systems has better graphics with Final Fantasy XIII than the other, it isn't a major issue. The graphical gap between the PS3 and the 360 isn't as large as the PSX and the PS2, they're basically on the same path when it comes the graphics and the small graphical difference isn't worth debating over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatal Rose Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 now I don't have a reason to buy a ps3 anymore I still need one for Tekken 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gouken Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 I believe the experience will overall be better on the PS3, it is being made for it first after all. Crystal tools sounds like a decent engine and tool set, very diverse. To be honest, the only difference between the two in my opinion will be no disc swapping on the PS3 and disc swapping on the 360. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devia Eleven Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 I believe the experience will overall be better on the PS3, it is being made for it first after all. Crystal tools sounds like a decent engine and tool set, very diverse. To be honest, the only difference between the two in my opinion will be no disc swapping on the PS3 and disc swapping on the 360. Disc swapping three or four times will really be a hassle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now