Smilee Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 I know i can't believe they actually fired Romero. This new Dawn of the Dead just looks cheesy. All the 70's zombie movies that Romero made were the best ones. Now they have crap zombie movies like House of the Dead.
Gryph Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 The problem with the new Dawn of the Dead is that they had a real budget.
BuRRdRinkA Posted March 11, 2004 Author Posted March 11, 2004 Yup Resident Evil did suck a$$! All I know is if anyone has the cash and the nerve to make Big budget movie, you better put it down!!!!!!!!!
kurupter13 Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 im still gonna watch the new dotd movie.about the re movie i agree cutting romero was stupid i heared his script was gonna be just like that game.just watching the old dotd movie makes me think what he could have done with re.
Magus Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 Well actually: 1. Aliens are very fast.2. They can climb walls.3. They can see in every vision mode (According to how the games of AvP play). I do believe that predators are better. They have different weapons to meet different needs. They seem to be rather intelligent (obviously), and they have the always nifty cloaking device and instant full-health medpack thingy. oh, and their disc owns all.
-VIOLENCE- Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 The problem with the new Dawn of the Dead is that they had a real budget. also another problem is, i heard from a friend who saw the trailer said that the zombies were running?? wtf is that ? RUNNING zombies? george, BRACE YOURSELF! i know that the zombie in the original 60's night of the living dead in the opening scene with barbara was "kind of running" but hey it was the original
BuRRdRinkA Posted March 11, 2004 Author Posted March 11, 2004 Good job...I thought the same thing, but coming from a film nut, I'm thinking that the film is trying to top the last popular "undead flick"-28 Days Later- in the amount of detail and suspense it protrays......
Gryph Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 I do believe that predators are better. They have different weapons to meet different needs. They seem to be rather intelligent (obviously), and they have the always nifty cloaking device and instant full-health medpack thingy. oh, and their disc owns all. And Predetors have those cool mini-nuclear devices as seen in the end of the first Predator movie. I really doubt the movie will top 28 Days (Later). That was a really good and frightful movie. Quite a different movie from Trainspotting.
Wizard Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 Let's not start Judging a book by its Cover unless already seen, RE was OK, wasnt good, I admit that. The new DotD compared to the old, is just holding us back untill we get the Dead Recokon(Some pick it up already damnit I want to see it). And yeah this DotD has a buget, so gory spots = going to own more. And the running zombie thing, bah, zombies are zombies, shoot them in the head and run like hell, SAME THING TO ME!
kurupter13 Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 omg r u guys saying that 28 days was a good movie that was one of the worst horror movies i seen. even my friends and family and everyone i know said it suck.i know it was a big hit in euro thats cause they film it there didnt they.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now