Shibathedog Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 I disagree, i like 2 over all of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 All the Bond games after GoldenEye have been more or less shite. Let's just hope that the new installment does things like it's supposed to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shibathedog Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 I agree, Although The World Is Not Enough for N64 wasnt THAT bad...although the multiplayer was complete crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mag Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 this is bad, I knew for sure, Electronic Arts doesnt have that type of developement aspect to create such a sequel from the n64 greatest hit, Goldeneye. EA has made previous bond titles but they are not even close to be as good as goldeneye. Have RARE to develope this sequel, i know EA doesnt have that sort of franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valovedder Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 I think that it is a huge mistake to make Goldeneye 2. The original will not be bettered and that is pretty much a guarantee. I agree all Bond games after Goldeneye have been very poor. This may be due to the high standards of Goldeneye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 this is bad, I knew for sure, Electronic Arts doesnt have that type of developement aspect to create such a sequel from the n64 greatest hit, Goldeneye. EA has made previous bond titles but they are not even close to be as good as goldeneye. Have RARE to develope this sequel, i know EA doesnt have that sort of franchise.I think RARE was dissolved...wasn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shibathedog Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 (edited) yes it was, all the creators of goldeneye have formed their own company called Free Radical, Therefore have free radical do goldeneye 2 Only reason i would run out and buy this first day is if they included a version of the original goldeneye with restored graphics/etc.. But leave the 800000 glitches in, those where hella fun and added to gameplay it still holds the award for glitchyest retail game ever to be released Edited April 16, 2004 by Shibathedog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanManXZ Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 ... all Bond games after Goldeneye have been very poor. This may be due to the high standards of Goldeneye.Right, cuz EA can't make a game right. First they buy the OO7 rights. Then they make crappy bond games. If RARE kept the rights they would have made an awsome sequel or even "die another day" game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now