random guy Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 Okay this is just a comparison between the video blitters on winkawaks. This is normal no scanlines: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
random guy Posted September 12, 2004 Author Share Posted September 12, 2004 This is kscale normal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
random guy Posted September 12, 2004 Author Share Posted September 12, 2004 And this is supereagle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 I prefer Super 2xSaI, but can't remember if Winkawaks had that. Anyway, does this thread have a meaning other than showcasing blitters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammaz Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 in FBAxxx.... Hardware:point filtering \ software:avanced mame 2x looks best on my mvs cabinet http://www.pixagogo.com/4126245911 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 I prefer Super 2xSaI, but can't remember if Winkawaks had that. Anyway, does this thread have a meaning other than showcasing blitters?I use normal blitter because it just looks normal. And yes, Kawaks has 2xSAI; it's under Kreed Blitters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weirdy Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 I like scale 2x, try it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 I'd rather go with HQxx filters, but meh, Kawaks doesn't have those (or then I'm blind). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iq_132 Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 Same here Agozer. I definitely prefer HQ2x + HQ4x to any other filters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[S4]The Phantom Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 Are you serious? HQxx filters come out even worse than not using filters in my view. The curves look awful and the computer slows down a lot... and my comp can run doom3 at medium so I don' think its because of my computer. Am I doing something wrong? At least in SSVS.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted September 12, 2004 Share Posted September 12, 2004 (edited) The Phantom,Sep 13 2004, 12:15 AM] Are you serious? HQxx filters come out even worse than not using filters in my view.I disagree, but you are correct in one aspect though: HQxx filters are extremely CPU dependant, especially 3x and 4x. Edited September 12, 2004 by Agozer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now