NeoRAGERx Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 Sublime music & sfx...what can u expect from another samsho <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i just got it to work, is it just me or are these the best sound effects ever on a mvs game? i mean playing it sounds alot like watching a Zatoichi film<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ur damn right best of tha best...i even made mp3s of them...very atmospheric... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiroshi Nohara Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 I got it working..... it's wonderful I tell you. I had to change the m1s and the vxs, just like you guys said. (how do you guys know all this?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoRAGERx Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 i want an AST of the music Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeon Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 I've been wondering about how this patch business might be able to be used as a loophole. Distributing roms are against the rules, period. But distributing patches seems to be ok. So what's to stop somebody from generating a patch for a romset against any arbitry known file (eg command.com) and posting that? All the user has to do is apply this patch on the known file, and he'll get the rom.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> the idea is simply not to take the risk of being sued / shutdown or any crap like those by helping in distribution of copyrighted ROM images. patches alone are useless without the ROMs to begin with. they are simply considered tools and are as legit as other ROM utilties on the internet (ROMBuild, MGD -> MVS converter, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugenn Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 (edited) I've been wondering about how this patch business might be able to be used as a loophole. Distributing roms are against the rules, period. But distributing patches seems to be ok. So what's to stop somebody from generating a patch for a romset against any arbitry known file (eg command.com) and posting that? All the user has to do is apply this patch on the known file, and he'll get the rom.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> the idea is simply not to take the risk of being sued / shutdown or any crap like those by helping in distribution of copyrighted ROM images. patches alone are useless without the ROMs to begin with. they are simply considered tools and are as legit as other ROM utilties on the internet (ROMBuild, MGD -> MVS converter, etc.)<{POST_SNAPBACK}> You don't get the point. The originals are not needed if you generate an IPS against some known file on the OS. Afterall, a patch is really just the diff between ANY 2 files.eg. i generate an IPS between m1 and command.com and distribute that "patch", anyone with the same command.com can apply this IPS and it gives back the m1. Edited November 9, 2004 by ugenn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted November 9, 2004 Author Share Posted November 9, 2004 These patches do not have the whole rom data Only the changes theres no way you turn it into a rom without the correct rom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugenn Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 That's if you generated the patch against the ROM. I'm talking about when you generate the patch against command.com or something else available on all Windows PCs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeon Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 (edited) I've been wondering about how this patch business might be able to be used as a loophole. Distributing roms are against the rules, period. But distributing patches seems to be ok. So what's to stop somebody from generating a patch for a romset against any arbitry known file (eg command.com) and posting that? All the user has to do is apply this patch on the known file, and he'll get the rom.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> the idea is simply not to take the risk of being sued / shutdown or any crap like those by helping in distribution of copyrighted ROM images. patches alone are useless without the ROMs to begin with. they are simply considered tools and are as legit as other ROM utilties on the internet (ROMBuild, MGD -> MVS converter, etc.)<{POST_SNAPBACK}> You don't get the point. The originals are not needed if you generate an IPS against some known file on the OS. Afterall, a patch is really just the diff between ANY 2 files.eg. i generate an IPS between m1 and command.com and distribute that "patch", anyone with the same command.com can apply this IPS and it gives back the m1.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> well yes, its true that its possible. but IPS patching basically has a general usage that it cant really be deemed as illegal. theres just too many variables (not to include end-users ability to understand these). i think what theyre really trying to do is to prevent any illegal material on the site/forums and IPS patches are the next best thing to circumvent ROM needs. if IPS patching are law-breakers then this site would have been shut down by Nintendo ages ago. Edited November 9, 2004 by Xeon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted November 9, 2004 Author Share Posted November 9, 2004 That's if you generated the patch against the ROM. I'm talking about when you generate the patch against command.com or something else available on all Windows PCs.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Well those sort patches will not be allowed IPS patches are ok.Now are you trying to get patches banned on here as well ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugenn Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 That's if you generated the patch against the ROM. I'm talking about when you generate the patch against command.com or something else available on all Windows PCs.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Well those sort patches will not be allowed IPS patches are ok.Now are you trying to get patches banned on here as well ?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Just asking, James. Settle down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted November 9, 2004 Author Share Posted November 9, 2004 Just asking, James. Settle down <{POST_SNAPBACK}> James Slaps ugenn around a bit with a large trout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts